as a function of log max density in code units; shown are the top 13 cores
| 1 | 11.04 |  |
 |
 |
 |
|||
| 2 | 11.02 |  |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| 3 | 10.93 |  |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
| 4 | 10.89 |  |
 |
 |
 |
|||
| 5 | 10.80 |  |
 |
 |
 |
 |
||
| 6 | 10.73 |  |
 |
 |
||||
| 7 | 10.69 |  |
 |
 |
 |
|||
| 8 | 10.50 |  |
 |
 |
 |
 |
||
| 9 | 10.39 |  |
 |
 |
||||
| 10 | 10.21 |  |
 |
 |
 |
|||
| 11 | 10.15 |  |
 |
 |
 |
 |
||
| 12 | 8.78 |  |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| 13 | 7.12 |  |
||||||
|
Cores 3, 4, 7, and 8 form a miltiple system and later merge into a single disk scale 0.02 pc; effective resolution 131,072 |
||||||||
| 3 4 7 8 |
10.01 |  |
 |
 |
 |
 |
||
|
On a larger scale, the system belongs to a dense filament scale 0.4 pc; effective resolution 8,192 |
||||||||
| 3 4 7 8 |
7.14 |  |
 |
 |
||||
Comments to: akritsuk@ucsd.edu